« Boo Says "BOO!" to Obama's "Spread the Wealth" | Main | So It's President Obama »

November 04, 2008

Thank You Sweet Blessed Baby Jeebus

That this Election Day has finally come. I am so tired and disgusted by this whole thing. The Republicans frankly deserve a drubbing for how they've screwed things up; the Democrats are chomping on the bit to impose 'Fairness' and societal leveling and criminalize political disagreements. There's no winning here, only a way to try and limit the damage until we can find a way to get rid of both of these parties.

The parties have had glorious, shining moments in their past of which they can be rightly proud; both of them have. But as it stands now they, like any human institutions, have become corrupted by their power and have morphed into creatures mainly concerned with their own survival, their own continued hold on political power. I think both parties are ready to fracture. The Republicans are dispirited by how their leadership has abandoned most of the principles they claim to hold dear; Democrats are a roiling bucket of special-interest pandering held together only by their hatred of Bush. Assuming he wins I think that President Obama will be stunned by the vitriol that will flow his way from his own side when his followers discovery that he is not, in fact, able to control the tides and introduce eternal Spring.

Closer to home, for my fellow NJ voters we have some ballot questions.

On Question 1, I recommend a "Yes" vote, as I want as much spending/bond issuing as possible to require voter approval. Trenton needs to be reined in; it's our money. Now I understand the loophole that people are complaining about with this, that the concurrent legislation allows them to refinance old debts and slip that under the radar, but guess what? We're stuck paying that no matter what; the bastards have put us on the hook for billions and the only way to solve things is to get rid of the people doing the spending. This is a step in the right direction.

On Question 2, I recommend voting "No." As much as I am a big proponent of local involvement and control, and I really am in favor of having the locals involved in their town's concerns, there needs to be some level of oversight at the State level to counter balance entrenched local machines. There's definitely a dynamic tension here, and I prefer that the Governor and the Legislature retain some review of pan-municipal appointments.

So go vote, crack open a bottle or three of wine and toast the future.

Posted by Mr. Bingley at November 4, 2008 07:36 AM

Comments

Politics has gotten uglier, politicians more corrupt as their power has increased. The federal government no longer sees any bounds on their power and authority.

The only solution to the acrimony and corruption is to castrate the power of the federal government to its rightful level of unimportance.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 08:47 AM

I don't see what is going to castrate the fed's power, Skyler. After all they just discovered they can spend $700 billion nobody knew they had.

I voted no on almost all the money questions on the Maryland ballot but then I am spitting against the wind in an overwhelmingly Democratic state.

Posted by: Retread at November 4, 2008 09:57 AM

Mr. B, are you keeping an eye on the stock market? I expected a flat day but, wrong again! Every thing is up, and by a good bit!

Posted by: Retread at November 4, 2008 11:13 AM

Yeah, it's up a couple hundred, isn't it? Yippee!

I'm still a seller here; I think things will get worse before they get better.

Of course, I hope I am wrong...

Posted by: Mr. Bingley at November 4, 2008 11:38 AM

You're right Retread. That's why I'm so gloomy lately. We're doomed. There is no cure for the state that our nation has gotten to. We are about to elect a communist or an extreme socialist. It's not because people don't know that they are what they are, it's that they don't care or that they agree with socialism. Our nation is philosophically dominiated by the idea of socialism and a federal government with no limit to its scope of power -- on both sides of the aisle.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 11:40 AM

I'm nott as vote as you think I am... [hic]

Posted by: nightfly at November 4, 2008 12:19 PM

I can't wait to start drinking, 'Fly.

Don't tease me like this!

Posted by: Mr. Bingley at November 4, 2008 12:58 PM

I voted last week, thanks to vote-by-mail. Although I hand carried my ballot to the courthouse. Just to be sure.

Alas, I agree with Skyler and Retread's assessment. No matter who wins the election, there are rocky roads ahead for America.

Posted by: The_Real_JeffS at November 4, 2008 01:34 PM

I did my best to get a beer with lunch but had no joy. I'm now watching to clock tick slowly to quitting time and the stock market jump three percent (at 2pm). It seems American capitalism will be glad to see the end of Bush's presidency. Am I the only one left who doesn't despise W and all his works?

Posted by: Retread at November 4, 2008 02:05 PM

No, Retread, you are not alone. But probably in the minority, like me.

Posted by: The_Real_JeffS at November 4, 2008 02:23 PM

I don't completely despise Bush. I think of all the presidents in my living memory, he is among the most honest and well-intentioned of the lot, with the rather severe exception of his advocating mistreating prisoners.

The problem with Bush is that he didn't feel a need to convince the American people that he was doing the right thing. He seemed to think that us little people need not be involved in weighty issues that might confuse us. He allowed his detractors to define him and his supporters as evil, and he did not object to that characterization.

He did nothing to provide leadership to the country and his party to rein in the petty corruption of congress and the massive spending.

He didn't know of a government program that he didn't think couldn't be made better by being bigger and more powerful.

He created the department of homeland security.

So, what's to like in the man? He didn't give us much reason to support him.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 02:34 PM

Shit.

I'm tired.

Posted by: tree hugging sister at November 4, 2008 03:59 PM

Skyler-How many transcripts from whitehouse.gov have you read over the past eight years? President Bush has often made quite eloquent arguments about any number of issues, including to members of his own party. Rarely do more than a line or two show up in the MSM, if that. That's not to say there aren't valid criticisms that he could have fought harder on some issues or wielded the veto pen more, but the sad truth is that much of his words have never made to the public.

Posted by: Dave E. at November 4, 2008 05:51 PM

I second what skyler said about Bush.

As for myself, I'll be glad to not come home from work to an answering machine filled with political messages.

Posted by: Gunslinger at November 4, 2008 05:52 PM

My take on Bush Jr. is that he is a decent man of great personal courage . He was extraordinarily tested by horrible events (9/11, Katrina). Unfortunately for the nation, he valued loyalty over competence. I do believe, however, that his reputation will be somewhat salvaged in 20 years or so. I remember how people sneered at and hated Reagan. I don't think Bush is another Reagan; he didn't defend conservative positions as he ought to have done. But I don't think he's another Hoover either. Like Reagan, he had nerve and did what he thought was right. Obama, in contrast, will cave to Pelosi, Reid and any special interest that got him elected.

Posted by: NJ Sue at November 4, 2008 07:05 PM

Dave, it doesn't matter if he said or didn't say anything or whether it was eloquent. He didn't make the sale. He didn't spread the message. His words never had impact. There's only one person to blame and that's himself.

I left out his singlemost horrible act and that was the bailout. It was unconscionable.

Like I said earlier, I don't doubt his honesty or his intentions. He just didn't care to be persuasive.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 07:40 PM

"His words never had impact".

Kind of tough to do when most people never hear them because they are filtered out of most mainstream media outlets.

Damn that Bush for not putting a gun to the collective MSM head and forcing them to honestly report.

(snort)

Posted by: Dave E. at November 4, 2008 08:34 PM

That's his job, Dave, that's his job.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 08:58 PM

Put a gun to the MSM?

I hope you get your Fuhrer someday.

Not.

Posted by: Dave E. at November 4, 2008 09:14 PM

Dave, calm down and don't talk like you aren't capable of intelligent thought.

The president's job is to get people to listen to him. You know, the bully pulpit and all. Transcripts of speeches don't cut it. He needs to press the flesh, get out and about and sell his ideas. It's called leadership, the art of convincing people to follow you.

The press is biased, no doubt, but there are ways to make them pay attention, and he failed to get them to pay attention. That's no one's fault but his own. He gave up.

Posted by: Skyler at November 4, 2008 10:49 PM

Skyler, I'm plenty calm. Please use your own capacity for intelligent thought and map out exactly what you think Bush could have done with a completely uncooperative and hostile MSM. Details, man, details. And please spare me your airy condescension.

Posted by: Dave E. at November 4, 2008 11:31 PM

Remember that for the past eight years dissent was the highest form of patriotism?

Think that will still be true in an Obama administration?

re NJ Sue. Can anyone think of legislation that a Dem Congress would put on his desk that President Obama would veto?

Posted by: barking spider at November 5, 2008 06:13 AM

Spider, that may be true, but let's not forget that Bush didn't veto anything, not one bill, until 2006.

Posted by: Mr. Bingley at November 5, 2008 07:38 AM

Correct Mr Bingley. W signed into law Pferdkaese that he surely would have vetoed if a Dem Congress gave it to him.

Republicans thought they would have an eternal majority and quit acting like Republicans.

Heck, when the GOP presidential nominee has to choose a VP candidate that will get Republicans to vote for him you know where the party is going.

As a recovering person I cannot join you in the post-election liquid soothing, but I am with you in spirits.

Posted by: barking spider at November 5, 2008 04:38 PM